Juan Ignacio Blanco  


  MALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

  FEMALE murderers

index by country

index by name   A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z




Murderpedia has thousands of hours of work behind it. To keep creating new content, we kindly appreciate any donation you can give to help the Murderpedia project stay alive. We have many
plans and enthusiasm to keep expanding and making Murderpedia a better site, but we really
need your help for this. Thank you very much in advance.




Ronald Curtis CHAMBERS






Classification: Murderer
Classification: Murderer - Robbery
Number of victims: 1
Date of murder: March 9, 1975
Date of birth: January 11, 1955
Victim profile: Mike McMahan, 22
Method of murder: Struck in the head with the barrel of the shotgun
Location: Dallas County, Texas, USA
Status: Sentenced to death on January 8, 1976. On January 22, 2007, the United States Supreme Court granted an indefinite stay of execution


Dallas man on death row gets fourth trial after review

Man first sentenced in '75 to have fourth chance in court

By Diane Jennings - The Dallas Morning News

January 2, 2008

Ronald Curtis Chambers, who has been on death row longer than anyone in state history, will receive yet another sentencing trial – his fourth – under an order issued by the U.S. 5th Circuit Court of Appeals.

The U.S. Supreme Court had previously ordered the lower court to review the case because the jury in Mr. Chamber's third death penalty trial may have received faulty instructions before rendering the sentence.

Defense attorneys hope to be able to negotiate a life sentence for the man who murdered 22-year-old Mike McMahan and left Deia Sutton to die in the Trinity River bottom in 1975.

"The important thing to consider is Mr. Chambers' age, as well as the extraordinary expense of seeking another death verdict," said attorney Jordan Steiker, a law professor at the University of Texas.

Mr. Chambers was 20 when he committed the crime and has spent almost 32 years on death row.

"It's hard to imagine that the Dallas taxpayers would want to spend millions more," Mr. Steiker said.

Another attorney for Mr. Chambers, James W. Volberding of Tyler, added, "It seems unfair to put the victim in this case through another trial."

But Ms. Sutton, who now goes by her married name of Roberts, remains resolute about her desire for the death penalty. She has testified against Mr. Chambers in each of his three previous trials.

"I never will be done," she said. "I'm still holding out for the death penalty."

Last year, Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins indicated he would pursue the death penalty again if another sentencing trial were ordered. But on Wednesday, spokeswoman Jamille Bradfield said it was "premature for us to comment at this point."

Mr. Chambers was first convicted and sentenced to death in 1975, after he and two accomplices abducted the couple at gunpoint as they were leaving a Dallas nightclub. Ms. Sutton was shot, beaten and choked but managed to survive.

Mr. Chambers was tried a second time 10 years later, after courts determined he was not warned that information from a psychiatric interview could be used against him. Mr. Chambers received a third trial in 1992 after courts determined that jury selection had been racially tainted.

Each time, he was sentenced to death.

Mr. Chambers was scheduled to die last year but received a reprieve from the U.S. Supreme Court a few days before the date. Several months later, the case was sent back to the 5th Circuit for review because jury instructions in his 1992 trial did not allow jurors to properly consider mitigating factors that might have made the death penalty inappropriate.

The factors include "his exposure to violence and drugs, his lack of role models, and his lack of economic opportunity while being raised in the projects of west Dallas," according to the 5th Circuit ruling.

The faulty jury instructions have since been changed, but some inmates sentenced at that time remain on death row.


Ronald Chambers

January 23, 2007

On Monday, January 22nd, 2007, the United States Supreme Court granted an indefinite stay of execution to Ronald Chambers. Mr. Chambers, who been on Texas' death row for over 31 years, was scheduled to be executed on January 25th. The stay came in the form of a one-line order written by Justice Scalia; the order did not specify the reason for or duration of the stay. It appears likely that the Supreme Court has stayed the execution in order to give itself time to render a decision in three death penalty cases heard the previous week, and then to apply the impact of those decisions to Mr. Chambers' case.


Texas Attorney General

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Media Advisory: Ronald Chambers Scheduled For Execution

AUSTIN – Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott offers the following information about Ronald Curtis Chambers, who is scheduled to be executed after 6 p.m. Thursday, January 25, 2007. In 1992, Chambers was convicted and sentenced to death for the third time for the 1975 Dallas County capital murder of Mike McMahan. A summary of the evidence presented at trial follows.


On the night of April 10, 1975, Chambers and codefendant Clarence Ray Williams kidnaped Mike McMahan and his date Deia Sutton from the parking lot of a Dallas nightclub. The kidnapers robbed the couple and took them to the levee on the Trinity River, where Chambers forced Sutton and McMahan from the car and ordered them down the embankment.

Sutton saw Chambers with a shotgun and a pistol. then heard five gunshots and was struck in the back of the neck by a bullet and fell. McMahan was also struck and rolled down the hill. Chambers and Williams then retreated up the hill.

Unfortunately, McMahan called out to Deia to see if she was alright. Sutton heard Williams say, “Hey, man, they’re not dead,” and Chambers respond, “They gotta be dead. I shot 'em in the head.” Then both Williams and Chambers came back down the hill, where Chambers struck McMahan ten to twenty times in the head with the barrel of the shotgun, and ordered Williams to take the woman into the water.

Williams pulled Deia to the water and attempted to choke and drown her. When Chambers finished beating McMahan, he walked toward Deia. As she begged him not to kill her, he raised his shotgun over his head and struck her three times. Chambers and Williams left both victims for dead, but Deia survived. McMahan died as a result of multiple blows to the head; he also suffered a punctured lung and two gunshot wounds.

  • Apr. 21, 1975 — A Dallas County grand jury indicted Chambers for capital murder in the death of Mike McMahan.

  • Dec. 18, 1975 — Judgment was entered after a jury found Chambers guilty of capital murder and following a separate punishment hearing, the court assessed a sentence of death.

  • May 24, 1978 — The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Chambers’ conviction and sentence on direct appeal.

  • Dec. 5, 1984 — The Court of Criminal Appeals granted Chambers’ successive application for state habeas relief and set aside Chambers’ conviction based on the State’s failure to mirandize him before having him interviewed by a State psychiatrist.

  • Nov. 1, 1985 — Chambers was reindicted on capital murder charges.

  • Dec. 20, 1985 — Judgment was entered after a jury found Chambers guilty of capital murder and following a separate punishment hearing, the court assessed a sentence of death.

  • Oct. 25, 1989 — The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals reversed Chambers’ second conviction for Batson v. Estelle error.

  • June 26, 1992 — Judgment was again entered after a jury found Chambers guilty of capital murder and following a separate punishment hearing, the court assessed a sentence of death.

  • June 28, 1995 — The Texas Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed Chambers’ conviction and sentence were affirmed on direct appeal.

  • Mar. 24, 1999 — The Court of Criminal Appeals denied Chambers’ application for state habeas relief and adopted the findings of the trial court.

  • Oct. 26, 1999 — Chambers filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus in a U.S. district court.

  • Aug. 26, 2003 — The federal district court denied Chambers federal habeas relief.

  • Jul. 21, 2006 — The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the lower court’s denial of relief.

  • Oct. 17, 2006 — Chambers petitioned the U.S. Supreme Court for certiorari review. This action remains pending.


Chambers was nineteen at the time he committed the murder but did not have any prior convictions.


For death row inmate, third reprieve in 1975 Dallas case

Convict, surviving victim of attack endure 3 decades of rulings

By Diane Jennings - The Dallas Morning News

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

LIVINGSTON, Texas – Deia Sutton Roberts and Ronald Curtis Chambers have sat front row center in the capital punishment arena for more than 30 long years – since just after the modern death penalty was reinstated.

He was set to die Thursday for the brutal murder of college student Mike McMahan in Dallas' Trinity River bottom in 1975; she's the other victim, who survived being robbed, shot, choked and beaten to testify against Mr. Chambers.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court guaranteed that their torturous tandem journey through the capital punishment world will drag on – possibly for years – after it granted Mr. Chambers a stay of execution.

Though no reason was given, Mr. Chambers' attorneys have raised questions about jury instructions regarding mitigating evidence, an issue pending in the court, and whether keeping someone on death row for decades is cruel and unusual punishment.

Ms. Roberts, a Dallas wife and mother, was disappointed and angry by the latest setback Monday afternoon – but determined.

"This man did an incredibly violent thing," she said. "He's been tried and convicted three times with the same outcome – the death penalty. That's the law, and it should be carried out."

Mr. Chambers, who has lived alone in a 60-square-foot cell on death row for more than 31 years – longer than anyone in state history – could not be reached for comment Monday. His attorney James Volberding, who has worked on the case for more than 10 years, was relieved by the ruling.

"We were all sweating," he said.

The Supreme Court's action halted the execution but has not determined how the case will be handled.

Regardless of what happens, neither side is ready to quit.

"Never," Ms. Roberts said.

"No way in hell," said Janna McMahan, sister of the victim.

Dallas County District Attorney Craig Watkins said that if a new sentencing trial is required, his office would seek the death penalty.

"It's pretty clear-cut," he said. "I've seen the pictures, I've read the police report. It's pretty bad."

Mr. Chambers has never volunteered to die or drop his appeals.

"Everybody has survival instincts," Mr. Chambers said in an interview before the stay was issued. "I'm not a person who believes in suicide or self-destruction."

For both sides, the view of the evolving death penalty over the past three decades has been rarely pretty and is always personal.

As a 20-year-old college student, Deia Sutton didn't devote much thought to capital punishment. It had been outlawed in 1972 by the U.S. Supreme Court because of its arbitrary nature. Texas legislators refined the law to meet the court's concerns and reinstated the death penalty in 1974.

Didn't fight abduction

But Ms. Sutton hadn't been touched by violent crime then. She felt invincible. That changed in April 1975, when she and Mr. McMahan were abducted at gunpoint from the parking lot of a nightclub by Mr. Chambers and Clarence Williams.

"We did everything 'right,' " said Ms. Roberts, now 52, who goes by her married name. "We left at a reasonable time, when people were still there. And when they abducted us, everything they asked for, whatever they asked for, we gave it to them. We didn't resist when they said, 'Get out of the car.' "

According to court records, Mr. Williams drove to the Trinity River bottoms with Mr. McMahan in the front seat. In the back, Mr. Chambers, 20, laid a shotgun on the floor and held a pistol to Ms. Roberts' face, threatening to kill her. He took her watch, coat and purse.

After Mr. Williams parked the car on a levee, the two men pushed the couple down the bank and shot them. A bullet lodged in Ms. Roberts' skull. After they crumpled to the ground, Mr. Williams and Mr. Chambers headed back to the car.

In a fateful move, Mr. McMahan then called out to Ms. Roberts, asking if she was all right. Mr. Williams and Mr. Chambers heard him and returned. Mr. Chambers beat him repeatedly with the shotgun. Mr. Williams beat and choked Ms. Roberts, then Mr. Chambers struck her with the gun.

The two men left again, assuming both victims were dead.

Mike McMahan did die. His cranial bone had been driven into his brain, and one of his ribs had fractured and been driven into his lung, according to the autopsy.

Amazingly, Ms. Roberts survived. She managed to stagger to a hotel for help.

Her physical wounds healed quickly, though the bullet remains in her skull. The psychological wounds took longer to mend.

Years later, she can't watch violent movies or read certain novels. She's cautious about going out at night, even to the grocery store, and won't enter a dim parking lot if she feels uneasy. Probably more than most mothers, she worries about her children's safety.

And she still has graphic nightmares.

"There is not a week goes by, I don't think or dream about it," she said. "They are images that just don't go away even after all these years."

Through the years, she has wrestled the horrific memories into a corner of her mind. But the nightmares come more often when a development occurs in the case. Over three decades, developments have occurred frequently, including parole hearings for Mr. Williams, who pleaded guilty and received two concurrent life sentences, three trials for Mr. Chambers, numerous appeals, and now the stay of execution.

Still, Ms. Roberts is steadfast. She has testified at each trial, kept up with the appeals and protested Mr. Williams' possible parole.

If she was ignorant about the death penalty in 1975, she's not anymore.

"I do believe in the death penalty, because I experienced something so horrible that I can't imagine that this was an 'oops, I made a mistake and killed someone,' " she said.

"At some point, I don't care what your upbringing is or the circumstances you're in, you are responsible for your actions ... when you take somebody's life, you have to know there are consequences."

Three times, Mr. Chambers has been tried – in 1975 for the first time; in 1985 after courts determined that he was not warned that information from a psychiatric interview could be used against him; and in 1992 after courts determined that jury selection had been racially tainted.

And three times, he's been found guilty and sentenced to death.

Witnesses, evidence

Ms. Roberts wants criminal defendants to have a fair trial. But she doesn't understand why in cases in which there is little question of guilt, second, third – and now possibly a fourth – chances are given. Mr. Chambers was tied to the killing not only by her testimony and that of others, but also by physical evidence including her purse and the shotgun found in his possession.

"It sometimes appears to me that our system is more concerned about protecting the guilty than the victim," she said. "I think things should be more swift. ... He was guilty in '75 and he was guilty in '85 and he was guilty in '92 and he's guilty in 2007."

During the dark days, she leans on her faith and her family, particularly her husband, Brad Roberts.

"We're trying to constantly overcome the gamesmanship between the lawyers," he said. "They're not arguing his innocence – they're trying to find some little technicality they can violate the system with."

Mike McMahan's sister said she, too, is puzzled by the constantly changing death penalty rules.

"Everybody does deserve a fair trial," Ms. McMahan said. "Some of the things have been retroactive, so to me, I don't think that's fair. ... You go by the rules that you have at that time, and that's what they did."

Dan Hagood, the former prosecutor who handled the Chambers case in 1992, understands their frustration. But the lengthy case is an aberration, he said.

"That's part of the system. ... You have to accept that if we're going to live in a country that ultimately all constitutional decisions are decided by a Supreme Court. ... That's much better than living in the land of Saddam Hussein, where the death penalty is enacted within days."

From where Mr. Chambers sits – in a tiny visiting room cubicle – the reversals and retrials mean the system is working. "They are not doing me any favors," he said. "They are following the law."

But if he is eventually executed, the system won't be working, he said, because the death penalty is "inappropriate for anybody."

"There's always hope for every individual," he said. "I don't care what they did. ... There is always hope."

Mr. Chambers, like Ms. Roberts, said he didn't think much about capital punishment in 1975. He was a 20-year-old from a rough West Dallas neighborhood but had never been in trouble except for minor infractions such as stealing coins from a laundromat.

"I really didn't know much about the legal system," he said, and then, "they weren't executing people."

He avoided answering questions about that night. But he said vaguely that "sometimes you can just be at a place, and everything just seems to escalate. It's not something preplanned."

He didn't want to say anything to his victim or their families publicly. He shook his head, adding: "I don't think they'd want to talk."

But he does feel remorse. "Everybody's got a heart," said the burly, soft-spoken man in a loose white shirt and pants. "Everybody feels remorse."

And he added: "I believe in God. Because I've asked for forgiveness, I don't have to keep asking."

A lot has changed since he arrived on death row. Then, the unit was housed in Huntsville and included a work program. But after an escape attempt, the work program was canceled. In 1999, death row was moved to Livingston, where the inmates are confined to their cells 23 hours a day.

One of the arguments pending before the Supreme Court is that "it's cruel and unusual for him to be sitting on death row for 32 years because of mistakes by the state," said attorney Volberding.

Now 52, Mr. Chambers said as long as he's been on death row, he's "done a life sentence twice." He's lived there longer than he did in the free world.

The argument that an extended stay on death row is cruel hasn't prevailed in lower courts, said Richard Dieter, executive director of the Death Penalty Information Center. But justices have hinted that "the Supreme Court may take this issue at some time."

The issue affects only a few inmates across the country, however. Only one other inmate in Texas has been on death row more than 30 years. The longest-serving death row inmate in the country is believed to be Gary Alvord, who has been on Florida's death row since 1974.

Defense attorneys are reluctant to push the issue, Mr. Dieter said, because "there is a danger that executions could be sped up" as a result of any such decision.

Mr. Chambers said that he would prefer to be living in the mountains but that his decades behind bars haven't been wasted.

He spends his time reading – anything except science fiction – and following sports by radio, since death row inmates don't have televisions. He also corresponds with European pen pals, who visit occasionally.

"I've been on death row since 1976," reads a description of him on a pen pal Web site. "I am loaded with patience. Love sports, music and good ice cream. I'm a student of beauty and a fan of individuality."

He's also watched his daughter grow up, from behind a plastic barrier, and he sometimes counsels schoolchildren by mail to stay out of trouble.

"Go to school, get an education, respect your elders," he said he writes them. "Be responsible."

Changes in executions

Not only have capital trials and death row changed in the last three decades – so has the execution itself. When Mr. Chambers was sentenced, he was to die in the electric chair. In 1977, lethal injection was adopted as a more humane method. In recent years, that method has been challenged.

Mr. Chambers shrugs off questions about the possible pain of lethal injection philosophically.

"Ain't nobody died and come back [to] say it's painful or not," he said, adding, "There's no humane way to kill somebody."

Deia Roberts declined to comment on whether Mr. Chambers deserves a painless death. But Ms. McMahan did.

"Do you think it matters to him the pain that he put my brother through, which was probably a heck of a lot more?" she asked.

Mr. Chambers appears more bothered by the 1996 law allowing the victim's friends and families to witness the execution.

If it ever happens, he doesn't want any family or friends to be there. And he can't understand why the victim's relatives would want to watch.

"That's all about vengeance," he said. "I don't feel any peaceful closure about that. I think that's kind of mixed up."

If Mr. Chambers is ever executed, Ms. McMahan plans to attend. "It would be too easy for me to stay at home and just distance myself from it," she said. "I do not take this lightly."

Deia Roberts won't be there.

"I don't need to see it to have closure," she said. "If I get the phone call that it has taken place, that's enough.

"I've already seen someone die," she whispers, struggling for composure. "I don't need to see someone else die."


Ronald Curtis Chambers


Ronald Curtis Chambers, 52, has lived on death row - which is now in Livingston -
longer than he lived in the free world.



home last updates contact